Rule #216: Don’t Use BCC
This may seem like an unusual rule to share with my children, but it’s a combination of a pet peeve, an ethical guideline, and a social standard. The way I see it, the use—or abuse—of blind carbon copy (BCC) is a reflection of character. It defines us socially, much like showing up to an interview without a suit or using the “f-word” indiscriminately. And not in a good way.
A brief history may help. The carbon copy began in 1806 when Ralph Wedgewood came up with a method to create a copy of a typed document. It went largely unnoticed until Lebbeus H. Rogers saw its potential while working with the Associated Press, turning it into a staple of offices across America until the late 1970s.
The lesson here is twofold: first, understand what a carbon copy is; second, recognize that the application of an idea is often more valuable than the idea itself. Much of life and business success comes from building on the ideas of others.
Back to BCC. I’m fairly certain it was a lawyer who added the “B” for “blind” carbon copy—because who else would invent a way to send correspondence intended as confidential to a third party, quietly implying, “Don’t let the recipient know I’m sending this to you”? While many lawyers are outstanding people, some are the sleazy types—and I suspect the first BCC came from one of those.
Exclusion exists in life—clubs, universities, and religions all sort and separate people—but exclusion becomes harmful when it’s cruel or deceptive. The BCC is like telling your roommate you’re going to the library, then sneaking off to a party without telling them. It communicates not only exclusion, but a lack of respect and trust.
You will encounter lies of fact and lies of omission in life. Both cause hurt, but lies of omission—like the BCC—often inflict deeper damage. The recipient expects trust in correspondence, and breaking that trust can have long-lasting consequences. I’ve seen business relationships permanently damaged over BCC misuse. While trust can be repaired, it takes significant effort and commitment.
Just because something exists, doesn’t mean it’s right. Society often rationalizes harmful behavior because it’s accessible or convenient—like driving up to a bar in Louisiana to get a Red Bull and vodka through a drive-thru. The existence of BCC doesn’t make its use ethical, healthy, or respectful.
Consider BCC as a practical lesson and a moral reminder: treat others as you wish to be treated. When faced with a decision, ask, “Is this healthy for me and for others?” Right and wrong can be murky, but the answer to that question is usually clear.
Takeaway: Avoid using BCC—it’s a matter of trust, respect, and integrity; transparency builds relationships, while secrecy erodes them.
Love, Dad